Reed v. St. Louis County Police Department et al
| Claudette Reed |
| St. Louis County Police Department, P.O. Cavanaugh, P.O. White, Schulze Glass, LLC, Charlie Schulze and Tim Brown |
| 4:2018cv00301 |
| February 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Nannette A. Baker |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss filed separately by Charlie Schulze and Tim Brown (ECF Nos. 26 , 28 ) are GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against each defendant as well as Schulze Glass, LLC, are DISMISS ED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Claudette Reed claims against St. Louis County, P.O. Cavanaugh, and P.O. White are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to effectuate timely service in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). A separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to Plaintiff Claudette Reed, 1411 Willow Brook Cove Apt. 3, St. Louis, Missouri 63146. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 1/8/2019. (AFC)
|
|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case to State Court (ECF No. 12 ) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on April 9, 2018. (BRP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
