Helderle v. Steele

Helderle v. Steele

Petitioner:	James M. Helderle
Respondent:	Troy Steele
Case Number:	4:2018cv00454
Filed:	March 23, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Francois
Presiding Judge:	Catherine D. Perry
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 25, 2018	Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Based upon petitioner's response, I conclude that the instant petition is unauthorized, and the signature thereon is a forgery. For these reasons, I will direct the Clerk of Court to close this case. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall close this case. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on April 25, 2018. (MCB)
April 3, 2018	Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FOR PETITIONER TO SHOW CAUSE (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, petitioner shall respond to the Court, in writing, and explain why he has filed the instant petition, cl arify what claims he intends to bring, and explain why the documents in Helderle I and the instant case bear different signatures. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's failure to timely respond shall result in the dismissal of this case, without prejudice and without further notice, as an abuse of the writ. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 4/3/18. (EAB)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 25, 2018

Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Based upon petitioner's response, I conclude that the instant petition is unauthorized, and the signature thereon is a forgery. For these reasons, I will direct the Clerk of Court to close this case. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall close this case. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on April 25, 2018. (MCB)

April 3, 2018

Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FOR PETITIONER TO SHOW CAUSE (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, petitioner shall respond to the Court, in writing, and explain why he has filed the instant petition, cl arify what claims he intends to bring, and explain why the documents in Helderle I and the instant case bear different signatures. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's failure to timely respond shall result in the dismissal of this case, without prejudice and without further notice, as an abuse of the writ. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 4/3/18. (EAB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Helderle v. Steele
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: James M. Helderle
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Troy Steele
Represented By:	Stephen D. Hawke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?