Healthman v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Healthman v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Plaintiff:	Troy Lee Heathman
Defendant:	Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number:	4:2018cv00720
Filed:	May 9, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge:	Rodney W. Sippel
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 205
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 24, 2019	Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees 26 is granted, and plaintiff shall recover attorney's fees from the Social Security Administration in the amount of $4,872.48.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, under the terms of the Assignment of Fee Agreement executed by the plaintiff in this case (Doc. # 27 -3), the award shall be made payable to attorney Jennifer Van Fossan unless plaintiff has a pre-existing debt owed to the United States, in which case the award shall be made payable to the plaintiff and subject to offset to satisfy that debt. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 4/24/19. (ARL)
January 15, 2019	Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion to reverse and remand 23 is granted, the decision of the Commissioner is reversed under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and this case is remanded for further proceedings. A separate Judgment is entered herewith.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 1/15/19. (KKS)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 24, 2019

Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees 26 is granted, and plaintiff shall recover attorney's fees from the Social Security Administration in the amount of $4,872.48.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, under the terms of the Assignment of Fee Agreement executed by the plaintiff in this case (Doc. # 27 -3), the award shall be made payable to attorney Jennifer Van Fossan unless plaintiff has a pre-existing debt owed to the United States, in which case the award shall be made payable to the plaintiff and subject to offset to satisfy that debt. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 4/24/19. (ARL)

January 15, 2019

Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion to reverse and remand 23 is granted, the decision of the Commissioner is reversed under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and this case is remanded for further proceedings. A separate Judgment is entered herewith.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 1/15/19. (KKS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Healthman v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Troy Lee Heathman
Represented By:	Jennifer M. Van Fossan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By:	Jane Rund(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?