Sayles v. Saint Louis University
Plaintiff: Laytonya Sayles
Defendant: Saint Louis University
Case Number: 4:2018cv00743
Filed: May 14, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Within US but Outside District
Presiding Judge: Catherine D Perry
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Accomodations
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 27 JUDGMENT. In accordance with the Memorandum and Order filed herewith, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that defendant Saint Louis University shall have summary judgment on plaintiff Laytonya Sayles' claims that it unlawfully terminated her employment on account of her race and disability, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e, et seq., and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 12101, et seq., and said claims against Saint Louis University are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 4/23/2019. (CBL)
April 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Saint Louis University's Motion for Summary Judgment #17 is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 4/23/2019. (CBL)
April 23, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 26, 27. Orders sent to party not electronically notified this date. Tue Apr 23 11:41:55 CDT 2019 (Long, Carol)
April 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Rule 16 conference previously set for April 26, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. is postponed until further order of the court, and the parties' obligation to file their Joint Scheduling Plan is suspended pending further order of the court. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 4/18/19. (EAB)
April 18, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 25. copy sent to non-electronic party on this date. Thu Apr 18 10:36:40 CDT 2019 (Brown, Erica)
April 11, 2019 Filing 24 REPLY to Response to Motion re #17 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Saint Louis University. (Phillips, Jerina)
April 4, 2019 Filing 23 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #22 Order, #17 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Laytonya Sayles. (MCB)
March 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall show cause, in writing and not later than April 4, 2019, why defendant should not be granted summary judgment as requested in the motion. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on March 20, 2019. (MCB)
March 20, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 22. sent to non-electronic party this date Wed Mar 20 14:35:46 CDT 2019 (Berg, Melanie)
February 25, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 21. copy sent to non-electronic party on this date. Mon Feb 25 08:56:29 CST 2019 (Brown, Erica)
February 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #19 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document Declaration of Michael J. Luna and Accompanying Exhibits by Defendant Saint Louis University. ORDERED: LEAVE GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 2/21/2019. (CBL)
February 20, 2019 Filing 20 SEALED DOCUMENT re #17 MOTION for Summary Judgment re Declaration of Michael J. Luna and Accompanying Exhibits by Defendant Saint Louis University. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Phillips, Jerina)
February 20, 2019 Filing 19 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document Declaration of Michael J. Luna and Accompanying Exhibits by Defendant Saint Louis University. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Phillips, Jerina)
February 20, 2019 Filing 18 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #17 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Saint Louis University. (Phillips, Jerina)
February 20, 2019 Filing 17 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendant Saint Louis University. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Phillips, Jerina)
February 20, 2019 Filing 16 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Saint Louis University. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Phillips, Jerina)
February 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CONFERENCE. (See Full Order.) This case is assigned to Track: 2 (Standard). Joint Scheduling Plan due by 4/19/2019. Rule 16 Conference set for 4/26/2019 09:30 AM in Courtroom 14S before District Judge Catherine D. Perry. Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant must appear in person. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 2/19/2019. (CBL)
February 19, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 15. Order Tue Feb 19 12:14:24 CST 2019 (Long, Carol)
February 14, 2019 Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Statement of Affirmative and Additional Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint by Saint Louis University.(Phillips, Jerina)
January 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer ; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 1/29/19. (CDP)
January 29, 2019 Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Saint Louis University. (Phillips, Jerina)
January 29, 2019 Filing 11 ENTRY of Appearance by Jerina Dominique Phillips for Defendant Saint Louis University. (Phillips, Jerina)
January 29, 2019 Filing 10 ENTRY of Appearance by Neal F. Perryman for Defendant Saint Louis University. (Perryman, Neal)
January 22, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Laytonya Sayles. Saint Louis University served on 1/10/2019, answer due 1/31/2019. (MCB)
December 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's claim under the ADEA is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 12/10/2018. (CBL)
December 10, 2018 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to defendant Saint Louis University. The summons was delivered via interoffice mail with USM 285 and Complaint to United States Marshal for service. (CBL)
December 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See full order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's claim under the ADEA is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. A separate order of partial dismissal will be entered herewith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to issue process or cause process to issue on plaintiffs Title VII claim by serving defendant Saint Louis University, c/o Office of the General Counsel, 221 Grand Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63103-2097. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 12/10/2018. (CBL)
December 10, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 6, 7, 8. Orders sent to party not electronically notified this date. Mon Dec 10 13:33:55 CST 2018 (Long, Carol)
December 4, 2018 Filing 5 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #4 Memorandum & Order by Plaintiff Laytonya Sayles. (MCB)
November 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel #3 is DENIED at this time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall show cause, in writing and no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, why plaintiff's ADEA claim should not be dismissed from this action for plaintiff's failure to adequately exhaust her administrative remedies with respect to this claim. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to respond to this Memorandum and Order, her claim brought pursuant to the ADEA will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 11/5/2018. (CBL)
November 5, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 4. Order sent to party not electronically notified this date. Mon Nov 5 15:34:59 CST 2018 (Long, Carol)
May 14, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Laytonya Sayles. (MFG)
May 14, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Laytonya Sayles. (MFG)
May 14, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Laytonya Sayles Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Laytonya Sayles. (Attachments: #1 EEOC Right to Sue Charging Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form (Box Not Selected))(MFG)
May 14, 2018 ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (MFG)
May 14, 2018 ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Mon May 14 17:02:43 CDT 2018 (admin,)
May 14, 2018 Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Catherine D. Perry. (MFG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sayles v. Saint Louis University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laytonya Sayles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Saint Louis University
Represented By: Neal F. Perryman
Represented By: Jerina Dominique Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?