Baker v. Fangio Enterprises, Inc. et al
Debra Baker |
Fangio Enterprises, Inc. and Tuesday Morning, Inc. |
4:2018cv00751 |
May 15, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Louis - County |
Charles A. Shaw |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Tuesday Morning, Inc.'s motion to dismiss, construed as a motion for judgment on the pleadings, is GRANTED. [Doc. 14] An appropriate partial judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order.. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 7/10/2018. (MRC) |
Filing 12 ORDER CONCERNING REMOVAL -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that by May 29, 2018, defendant Tuesday Morning, Inc. shall file an amended Notice of Removal alleging facts sufficient to establish: (1) plaintiff's citizenship both at the time of filin g and the time of removal, and (2) defendants' states of incorporation andprincipal place of business both at the time of filing and the time of removal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if defendant does not timely and fully comply with this order, this matter will be remanded to the state court from which it was removed, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Response to Court due by 5/29/2018.. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 5/22/2018. (MRC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.