Loughridge v. Atkinson et al
| Dennis Loughridge and Anna Potts |
| Unknown Atkinson, Unknown Robbins and Dent County Sheriff's Office |
| 4:2018cv00848 |
| June 4, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Dent |
| Shirley Padmore Mensah |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 2 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee of $59.47 within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) the statement that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to appoint counsel (Docket No. [3)] is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to STRIKE plaintiff Anna Potts from this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim and/or because it is legally frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915( e )(2)(B).A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 10/24/18. (KKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
