Briggs v. Rendlen
| Hon Charles E. Rendlen, III |
| Office of U.S. Trustee |
| Evette Nicole Reed |
| Ross H. Briggs |
| 4:2018cv01228 |
| July 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Jean C Hamilton |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER STRIKING NOTICE: Because the Notice of Appeal was filed in violation of the LBR 8001(A), the Court ORDERS that the Notice of Appeal be STRICKEN. Signed by Judge Charles E. Rendlen, III of the Bankruptcy Court of the Eastern District of Missouri on 7/25/18. (JWD)
|
| Filing 1 **STRICKEN PER ORDER DOC #3 ** Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court case number 14-44818-705. by Appellant Ross H. Briggs. (Attachments: #1 Order Denying Motion to Disqualify, #2 Order Denying Request to Hold Motion to Reinstate in Abeyance)(JWD) Modified on 8/8/2018 (KJS). |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Jean C. Hamilton. (JWD) |
| Transmission of Bankruptcy Appeal Record. Documents listed below may be viewed at # [Bankruptcy Court Pacer] (RE: related document(s)238 Generic Order, 245 Generic Order, 252 Notice of Appeal and Statement of Election filed by Interested Party Ross H. Briggs, 253 Auto-docket of Internet Credit Card Receipt, 254 Order (Generic)) (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
