Wilson v. Payne
Petitioner: Kenith R. Wilson
Respondent: Stanley Payne
Case Number: 4:2018cv01271
Filed: July 30, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge: Stephen N Limbaugh
Referring Judge: David D Noce
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 7, 2018 Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Caroline M. Coulter for Respondent Stanley Payne. (Coulter, Caroline)
August 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER This case is assigned to Track: 4, Administrative Show Cause Response due by 9/28/2018.. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 8/14/18. (MRS)
August 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Kenith R. Wilson motion is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 8/14/18. (MRS)
August 14, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 5,6. Tue Aug 14 10:22:15 CDT 2018 (Schaefer, Michelle)
August 13, 2018 Filing 4 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge David D. Noce termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr for all further proceedings. (JAB)
August 13, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 4. Mailed to party not set up for electronic notification Mon Aug 13 15:20:02 CDT 2018 (Bernsen, John)
July 31, 2018 Filing 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW)
July 31, 2018 ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DLB)
July 31, 2018 Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: Honorable David D. Noce. (DLB)
July 31, 2018 ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue Jul 31 16:01:20 CDT 2018 (admin,)
July 30, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis HABEAS CASES by Petitioner Kenith R. Wilson. (DLB)
July 30, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Kenith R. Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form, #2 Attachment, #3 Transcript, #4 Envelope, #5 Judge Assignment Label)(DLB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilson v. Payne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Stanley Payne
Represented By: Stephen D. Hawke
Represented By: Caroline M. Coulter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kenith R. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?