Federated Mutual Insurance Company v. Diamond Shoppe Jewelers, LLC
| Federated Mutual Insurance Company |
| Diamond Shoppe Jewelers, LLC |
| 4:2018cv01321 |
| August 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Ronnie L White |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Entry of Clerk's Default against Defendant Diamond Shoppe Jewelers, LLC [ECF No. #6 ] is GRANTED and the default of said defendant is hereby entered. (A copy of this Order mailed to Diamond Shoppe Jewelers, LLC.) (KCB) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Entry of Clerk's Default against Defendant Diamond Shoppe Jewelers, LLC by Plaintiff Federated Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Entry of Default)(Kraushaar, Corey) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Federated Mutual Insurance Company. Diamond Shoppe Jewelers, LLC served on 8/16/2018, answer due 9/6/2018. (Kraushaar, Corey) |
| Case Opening Notification: 1 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to Corey L. Kraushaar. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable Ronnie L. White. (MFG) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against defendant Diamond Shoppe Jewelers, LLC Jury Demand,, filed by Federated Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #3 Summons Summons to Defendant Diamond Shoppe Jewelers, LLC)(Kraushaar, Corey) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Federated Mutual Insurance Company Process Server: Dahlberg & Associates (Kraushaar, Corey) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Federated Mutual Insurance Company. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Kraushaar, Corey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Diamond Shoppe Jewelers, LLC with receipt number 0865-6694003, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Federated Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Kraushaar, Corey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Federated Mutual Insurance Company v. Diamond Shoppe Jewelers, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Federated Mutual Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Corey L. Kraushaar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Diamond Shoppe Jewelers, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
