Johnson v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Courtney Johnson |
Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
4:2018cv01358 |
August 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Louis - County |
Charles A Shaw |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: This case is assigned to Track: 2. Motion to Join Parties due by 1/22/2019. Discovery Completion due by 5/16/2019. ADR Future Reference 4/1/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 7/15/2019. Jury Trial set for 12/9/2019 09:30 AM before District Judge Charles A. Shaw. Pretrial Conference set for 12/5/2019 02:00 PM before District Judge Charles A. Shaw. SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 10/10/18. (JWD) |
Filing 9 JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. and Plaintiff Courtney Johnson. (Connolly, Brian) |
Filing 8 ORDER REQUIRING JOINT PROPOSED SCHEDULING PLAN : Joint Scheduling Plan due by 10/1/2018. SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 9/5/18. (JWD) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Experian Information Solutions, Inc..(Czerwien, Joseph) |
Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Joseph Zachary Czerwien for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Czerwien, Joseph) |
Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL - State Court docket sheet. (BAK) |
Filing 4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, St. Louis County, Missouri, filed by Courtney Johnson.(BAK) |
Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Charles A. Shaw. (BAK) |
Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. Parent companies: Experian plc, Publicly held company: Experian plc owns 100 percent of Experian. Experian plc is registered as a public company in Jersey, Channel Islands, and is publicly traded on the London Stock Exchange,. (Connolly, Brian) |
Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Brian J. Connolly for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Connolly, Brian) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis County, case number 18SL-CC02760, with receipt number 0865-6703415, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form)(Connolly, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Johnson v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Courtney Johnson | |
Represented By: | James W. Eason |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Brian J. Connolly |
Represented By: | Joseph Zachary Czerwien |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.