United States of America v. $8,689.00 U.S. Currency et al
| United States of America |
| $8,689.00 U.S. Currency and Miscellaneous Firearms and Ammunition |
| 4:2018cv01435 |
| August 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Audrey G Fleissig |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MARSHAL Return Executed. Type of return Complaint & Notice. (BRP) |
| Filing 5 MARSHAL Return Executed party served Jermaine Wooten, Esq., Type of return Complaint and Notice. (KCB) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION filed by Plaintiff United States of America of Publication. (Casey, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 MARSHAL Return Executed as to $8,689.00 U.S. Currency. (AFC) |
| Filing 2 MARSHAL Return Executed as to Miscellaneous Firearms & Ammunition. (AFC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT of Forfeiture against defendant All Defendants Non-Jury Demand,, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Warrant For $8,689.00, #4 Warrant For Firearms)(Casey, Stephen) |
| Forfeiture Warrant Issued as to defendants $8,689.00 U.S. Currency, Miscellaneous Firearms and Ammunition. (BAK) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
