Bodine v. Berryhill
Rosanna Bodine |
Nancy A. Berryhill |
SSA Office of General Counsel |
4:2018cv01447 |
August 29, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Patricia L Cohen |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Docket Text ORDER: Re #12 First MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint by Plaintiff Rosanna Bodine; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen on 10/4/18. (EAB) |
Filing 12 First MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint by Plaintiff Rosanna Bodine. (Van Fossan, Jennifer) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Rosanna Bodine. Nancy A. Berryhill served by serving the United States Attorney General. (CBL) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Rosanna Bodine. Nancy A. Berryhill served by serving the Office of Regional Counsel. (CBL) |
Filing 9 FULL CONSENT has been received by Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Plaintiff Rosanna Bodine. (EAB) |
Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Jane Rund for Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (Rund, Jane) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Rosanna Bodine. Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill served on 8/31/2018 by serving the U.S. Attorney, answer due 10/30/2018. (MCB) |
Filing 6 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. (See Full Order.) This case has been assigned to Track 4 (Administrative). This case has been randomly assigned to a United States Magistrate Judge. The parties have twenty-one (21) days from their entry of appearance to file their Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction forms. Pursuant to 12(a)(3) and (4), Fed.R.Civ.P., defendant must file any motion to dismiss, motion to remand, and/or answer within sixty (60) days of service of plaintiffs complaint. Along with its answer defendant shall file a transcript of the record, in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen on 8/30/2018. (CBL) |
Filing 5 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [#2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue on the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen on 8/30/2018. (CBL) |
Summons Issued as to defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. The summons were delivered via interoffice mail to United States Marshal for service. (CBL) |
Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW) |
Filing 3 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT - CJA 23 by Plaintiff Rosanna Bodine. (BAK) |
Filing 2 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Rosanna Bodine. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit CJA23)(Van Fossan, Jennifer) |
Filing 1 Social Security COMPLAINT Non-Jury Demand,Yes or No - Yes,, filed by Rosanna Bodine. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet , #2 Original Filing Form , #3 Summons Nancy Berryhill, #4 Summons Jeffrey Jensen, #5 Summons Jeff Sessions)(Van Fossan, Jennifer) |
Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.