United States of America v. 2016 Lamborghini Aventador, VIN: ZHWUR1ZDXGLA04692 et al
| United States of America |
| Miscellaneous Jewelry and 2016 Lamborghini Aventador, VIN: ZHWUR1ZDXGLA04692 |
| Eli Abraham |
| 4:2018cv01467 |
| August 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| John A Ross |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. § 881 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MOTION to Withdraw #11 MOTION to Stay and Joint Motion to Continue Rule 16 Conference by Plaintiff United States of America. (Casey, Stephen) |
Filing 15
ORDER:IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff United States of America shall file its reply to Claimant's response no later than Monday, October 29, 2018. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 10/25/2018. (CLO)
|
| Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by 2016 Lamborghini Aventador, VIN: ZHWUR1ZDXGLA04692, Eli Abraham, Miscellaneous Jewelry.(Schonfeld, Richard) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Stay filed by Defendants 2016 Lamborghini Aventador, VIN: ZHWUR1ZDXGLA04692, Miscellaneous Jewelry, Claimant Eli Abraham. (Schonfeld, Richard) |
|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Claimant Eli Abraham shall file his response in opposition to Plaintiff's motion, if any, no later than Friday, October 18, 2018. #11 . Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 10/16/18. (KKS)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Stay by Plaintiff United States of America. (Casey, Stephen) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CONFERENCE: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Scheduling Conference: Scheduling Conference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 is set for November 20, 2018, at 10:00 AM by telephone. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS) Joint Scheduling Plan due by 11/13/2018. Rule 16 Conference set for 11/20/2018 10:00 AM in Telephone before District Judge John A. Ross. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 10/15/2018. (CLO)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Return of Property Verified Claim and Demand for Return of Property by Defendants 2016 Lamborghini Aventador, VIN: ZHWUR1ZDXGLA04692, Miscellaneous Jewelry. (Schonfeld, Richard) |
| Filing 8 MARSHAL Return Executed party servedRita Aramyan, Type of return Complaint and Notice, (CLO) |
| Filing 7 MARSHAL Return Unexecuted party servedEli Abraham, Type of return Complaint and Notice, (CLO) |
| Filing 6 MARSHAL Return Unexecuted party served Kevin Boles, Type of return Complaint and Notices, (CLO) |
| Filing 5 MARSHAL Return Executed party servedRichard A. Schonfeld, Esq., Type of return Complaint and Notice, (CLO) |
| Filing 4 MARSHAL Return Executed party servedMiscellaneous Jewelry, Type of return Complaint and Warrant, (CLO) |
| Filing 3 MARSHAL Return Executed party served 2016 Lamborghini Aventador, VIN: ZHWUR1ZDXGLA04692, Type of return Complaint and Warrant, (CLO) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION filed by Plaintiff United States of America of Publication. (Casey, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT of Forfeiture against defendant All Defendants Non-Jury Demand,, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Warrant For 2016 Lamborghini Aventador, #4 Warrant For Miscellaneous Jewelry)(Casey, Stephen) |
| Forfeiture Warrant Issued as to defendants 2016 Lamborghini Aventador, VIN: ZHWUR1ZDXGLA04692, Miscellaneous Jewelry. (BAK) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge John A. Ross. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
