Saffall v. Precythe et al
| Herbert A. Saffall and Herbert A. Saffell |
| Stan Payne and Ann Precythe |
| 4:2018cv01504 |
| September 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Henry Edward Autrey |
| Noelle C Collins |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith.. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 10/30/2018. (AAS)
|
|
Filing 7
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. #3 ) is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, plaintiff must pay an initial filing fee of $20.20. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to Clerk, United States District Court, and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) this case number; and (4) the statement that the remittance is for an original proceeding.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs Motion to Appoint Counsel (Docket No. #2 ) is DENIED as moot.IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith.. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 10/30/2018. (AAS)
|
| ***REMARK Mailed Orders #7 & #8 to Herbert Saffall. (AAS) |
| Filing 6 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Henry Edward Autrey for all further proceedings. (AFC) |
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 6. Mailed to non-electronic party this date. Mon Sep 24 16:51:48 CDT 2018 (Cordray, Abby)
|
| Filing 5 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Thu Sep 13 16:02:31 CDT 2018 (admin,) |
| Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: Honorable Noelle C. Collins. (DJO) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DJO) |
| Filing 4 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Herbert A. Saffell. (DJO) Modified on 10/26/2018 (DJO). |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Herbert A. Saffell. (DJO) Modified on 10/26/2018 (DJO). |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Herbert A. Saffell. (DJO) Modified on 10/26/2018 (DJO). |
| Filing 1 DCM COMPLAINT against defendant Stan Payne, Ann Precythe Jury Demand,, filed by Herbert A. Saffell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - C, #2 Judge Assignment Label, #3 Envelope)(DJO) Modified on 10/26/2018 (DJO). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
