Benson v. Best Buy Company of Minnesota, Inc. et al
Patricia Benson |
Best Buy Company of Minnesota, Inc., James Ray Woodward and Best Buy Stores, LP |
4:2018cv01510 |
September 8, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Ronnie L White |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 RULE 16 ORDER This case is assigned to Track: 2: Standard. [SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS.] (Joint Scheduling Plan due by 11/9/2018. Rule 16 Conference set for 11/16/2018 10:30 AM in Chambers before District Judge Ronnie L. White.) Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 10/11/2018. (AFC) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to #11 Amended Complaint, by Best Buy Stores, LP, James Ray Woodward.(Boggs, Beth) |
Filing 12 Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Best Buy Company of Minnesota, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 6) is DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 10/1/18. (THL) |
Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant James Ray Woodward, Best Buy Stores, LP,Terminating Best Buy Company of Minnesota, Inc. Amendment to 10 Docket Text Order, yes Summons(es) issued, jury demand, , filed by Patricia Benson. Related document: 10 Docket Text Order,. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Notice of Intent to Use Process Server, #2 Summons Summons to Best Buy Stores, LP)(Holland, William) |
Filing 10 Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend by Interlineation (ECF No. 9) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint naming the proper defendant no later than October 1, 2018. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall effectuate service on the proper defendant. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 9/21/18. (THL) |
Filing 9 Consent MOTION to Amend/Correct by Interlineation by Plaintiff Patricia Benson. (Holland, William) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants Best Buy Company of Minnesota, Inc., James Ray Woodward (Proof of Filing in State Court) Sent To: State Court - Executed (Boggs, Beth) |
Case Opening Notification: All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable Ronnie L. White. (MFG) |
Filing 7 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Charles County, filed by Patricia Benson.(MFG) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Party by Defendant Best Buy Company of Minnesota, Inc.. (Boggs, Beth) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by James Ray Woodward.(Boggs, Beth) |
Filing 4 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendants Best Buy Company of Minnesota, Inc., James Ray Woodward.. (Boggs, Beth) |
Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Beth C. Boggs for Defendants Best Buy Company of Minnesota, Inc., James Ray Woodward. (Boggs, Beth) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants Best Buy Company of Minnesota, Inc., James Ray Woodward (Notice to Plaintiff) Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Attachment Notice of Removal)(Boggs, Beth) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Charles County Circuit Court, case number 1811-CC00706, with receipt number 0865-6742886, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Best Buy Company of Minnesota, Inc., James Ray Woodward. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Attachment State Court Filings with Docket Sheet)(Boggs, Beth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.