Hupalo et al v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The
| Michael Hupalo and Sharon Hupalo |
| Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The |
| 4:2018cv01707 |
| October 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Henry Edward Autrey |
| Nannette A Baker |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 30
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the scheduling conference pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 16 set for March 18, 2020, is vacated. The Case Management Order will be issued based on the dates provided by the parties in their Joint Proposed Scheduling Plan. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 3/5/20. (EAB)
|
|
Filing 29
Docket Text ORDER: Re #27 Consent MOTION to Continue Rule 16 Conference by Defendant Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 3/5/20. (EAB)
|
| Filing 28 JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Plaintiffs Michael Hupalo, Sharon Hupalo. . (McArthur, Matthew) |
| Filing 27 Consent MOTION to Continue Rule 16 Conference by Defendant Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The. (Hedger, Clark) |
|
Filing 26
RULE 16 ORDER This case is assigned to Track: 2. Joint Scheduling Plan due by 3/10/2020. Rule 16 Conference set for 3/18/2020 10:00 AM in Telephone before District Judge Henry Edward Autrey. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on February 26, 2020. (MCB)
|
| Filing 25 ANSWER to #24 Amended Complaint, and Affirmative Defenses by Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The.(Hedger, Clark) |
| Filing 24 AMENDED COMPLAINT Third Amended Complaint against defendant Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The Amendment to #19 Amended Complaint, jury demand, Third Amended Complaint, filed by Sharon Hupalo, Michael Hupalo. Related document: #19 Amended Complaint, filed by Sharon Hupalo, Michael Hupalo.(McArthur, Matthew) |
|
Filing 23
OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss, [Doc. No. #19 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs are given 14 days from the date of this Opinion, Memorandum and Order to file an amended complaint.( Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 12/10/2019.), ( Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 12/10/2019.). Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 11/26/19. (KJS)
|
| Filing 22 RESPONSE in Opposition re #20 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Plaintiffs Michael Hupalo, Sharon Hupalo. (McArthur, Matthew) |
| Filing 21 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #20 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The. (Hedger, Clark) |
| Filing 20 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendant Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The. (Hedger, Clark) |
| NOTICE: IF YOU HAVE ALREADY UPGRADED YOUR PACER ACCOUNT YOU CAN DISREGARD THIS NOTICE. IF YOU DO NOT UPGRADE YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO FILE IN THE SYSTEM AFTER MAY 31, 2019. PLEASE UPGRADE IMMEDIATELY. If you are using a shared account to file cases, you will need to create an individual account; instructions can be found at:#https://www.moed.uscourts.gov/sites/moed/files/Register-for-New-PACER-account.pdf. If you already have an individual account, it will need to be upgraded; instructions can be found #https://www.moed.uscourts.gov/sites/moed/files/Upgrade-Current-PACER-Account.pdf. If you need further assistance contact the MOED CM/ECF Help Desk at 314-244-7650 or #moedml_cmecf_help@moed.uscourts.gov. (CSAW) |
| Filing 19 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The Amendment to #11 Amended Complaint, jury demand, , filed by Sharon Hupalo, Michael Hupalo. Related document: #11 Amended Complaint, filed by Sharon Hupalo, Michael Hupalo.(McArthur, Matthew) |
|
Filing 18
OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss, [Doc. No. #13 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs are given 14 days from the date of this Opinion, Memorandum and Order to file an amended complaint.( Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 5/29/2019.) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 5/15/19. (KJS)
|
|
Filing 17
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #9 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendant Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The. (Hedger, Clark) filed by Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The ; ORDERED DENIED AS MOOT BY THE FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT.. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 5/9/19. (KJS)
|
| Filing 16 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The.. (Bott, Edward) |
| Filing 15 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #13 MOTION to Dismiss Case Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiffs Michael Hupalo, Sharon Hupalo. (McArthur, Matthew) |
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #13 MOTION to Dismiss Case Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The. (Hedger, Clark) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss Case Amended Complaint by Defendant Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The. (Hedger, Clark) |
| Filing 12 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiffs Michael Hupalo, Sharon Hupalo.. (McArthur, Matthew) |
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The Amendment to #5 Petition (Removal/Transfer) , filed by Sharon Hupalo, Michael Hupalo. Related document: #5 Petition (Removal/Transfer) filed by Sharon Hupalo, Michael Hupalo.(McArthur, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The. (Hedger, Clark) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendant Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The. (Hedger, Clark) |
| Filing 8 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Henry Edward Autrey for all further proceedings (CLA) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The Sent To: State Court - Executed (Hedger, Clark) |
| Filing 6 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW) |
| Filing 5 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Franklin County Circuit Court, filed by Sharon Hupalo, Michael Hupalo.(JWD) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Clark W. Hedger for Defendant Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The. (Hedger, Clark) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The Sent To: Plaintiff (Bott, Edward) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The. Parent companies: none, Subsidiaries: none, Publicly held company: none,. (Bott, Edward) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 20th JC, Franklin County MO, case number 18AB-CC00173, with receipt number 0865-6798511, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A State Court File, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form)(Bott, Edward) |
| Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: Honorable Nannette A. Baker. (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
