Osborne v. Spectrum Corp/Charter Communications
Candace Osborne |
Spectrum Corp/Charter Communications |
4:2018cv01801 |
October 23, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Henry Edward Autrey |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Case and MOTION to Compel Arbitration or, in the Alternative, to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration filed by Defendant Spectrum Corp/Charter Communications. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Grice, Anthony) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Case and, MOTION to Compel Arbitration or, in the Alternative, to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration by Defendant Spectrum Corp/Charter Communications. (Grice, Anthony) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM by Plaintiff Candace Osborne. (KJS) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to defendant Spectrum Corp/Charter Communications. The summons was hand delivered to USMS. (AAS) |
Filing 4 OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. [ECF No. #2 ]IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. [ECF No. #3 ]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to issue process or cause process to issue on the complaint on defendant Spectrum Corp/Charter Communications. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 11/20/2018. (AAS) |
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 4. Tue Nov 20 15:06:22 CST 2018 (Shepard, Alicia) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Candace Osborne. (MFG) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Candace Osborne. (MFG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Candace Osborne Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Candace Osborne. (Attachments: #1 EEOC Right to Sue Charging Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 EEOC Right to Sue Charging Letter)(MFG) |
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue Oct 23 16:01:17 CDT 2018 (admin,) |
Case Opening Notification: All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable Henry E. Autrey. (MFG) |
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (MFG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Osborne v. Spectrum Corp/Charter Communications | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Spectrum Corp/Charter Communications | |
Represented By: | Anthony G. Grice |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Candace Osborne | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.