Sedlmayr v United States of America
| John R Sedmayr and John R. Sedlmayr |
| United States of America |
| 4:2018cv01826 |
| October 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Ronnie L White |
| Taxes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States' Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint [ECF No. 3] is GRANTED to and including February 14, 2019. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 12/21/18. (ALM)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, (Unopposed) by Defendant United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Aberg, Eric) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by John R. Sedlmayr. John R. Sedlmayr served on 10/31/2018, answer due 11/21/2018. (Kutten, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant JOHN R SEDLMAYR with receipt number 0865-6840622, in the amount of $400 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by JOHN R SEDLMAYR. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Kutten, James) |
| Case Opening Notification: 2 Summons(es) issued to US Attorney and US Attorney General. The summons were emailed to attorney James Allan Kutten. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Ronnie L. White. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
