NRRM, LLC v. John Doe
| NRRM, LLC |
| John Doe, dba automotiveguarantee.com and John Doe |
| 4:2018cv01868 |
| October 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| John A Ross |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 REPORT to Commissioner of filing or determination of an action regarding trademark. (BAK) |
| Case Opening Notification: All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge John A. Ross. (BAK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against defendant John Doe, dba automotiveguarantee.com with receipt number 0865-6850240, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by NRRM, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Civil Cover Sheet, #20 Form Disclosure of Organizational Interests, #21 Original Filing Form)(Kass, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
