Nekouee v. Arnold Park Mall, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Fred Nekouee
Defendant: Arnold Park Mall, LLC and Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2018cv01894
Filed: November 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Noelle C Collins
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 26, 2018 Notice from Clerk instructing Defendants Arnold Park Mall, LLC, Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. to submit Notice regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (AFC)
December 21, 2018 Filing 16 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc..(Mueller, Brandan)
December 13, 2018 Filing 15 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Arnold Park Mall, LLC.. (Bailey, T.)
December 13, 2018 Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Arnold Park Mall, LLC.(Bailey, T.)
December 10, 2018 Filing 13 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Mueller, Brandan)
November 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.'s Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File its Answer or Other Responsive Pleading (Doc. #10 ) is GRANTED; and that Defendant Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before December 21, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins on 11/30/2018. (AFC)
November 29, 2018 Filing 11 ENTRY of Appearance by Shannon David Peters for Defendant Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.. (Peters, Shannon)
November 29, 2018 Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Other Responsive Pleading by Defendant Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.. (Mueller, Brandan)
November 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Arnold Park Mall, LLC's Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File its Answer or Other Responsive Pleading (Doc. #8 ) is GRANTED; and that Defendant Arnold Park Mall, LLC, shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before December 20, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins on 11/28/2018. (AFC)
November 27, 2018 Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Arnold Park Mall, LLC. (Harris, Lauren)
November 27, 2018 Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Lauren B. Harris for Defendant Arnold Park Mall, LLC. (Harris, Lauren)
November 27, 2018 Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by T. Christopher Bailey for Defendant Arnold Park Mall, LLC. (Bailey, T.)
November 12, 2018 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Fred Nekouee. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. served on 11/9/2018, answer due 11/30/2018. (Vincze, Robert)
November 12, 2018 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Fred Nekouee. Arnold Park Mall, LLC served on 11/8/2018, answer due 11/29/2018. (Vincze, Robert)
November 7, 2018 Filing 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW)
November 7, 2018 Case Opening Notification: 2 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to Robert Joseph Vincze. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable Noelle C. Collins. (MFG) Modified on 11/7/2018 (MFG).
November 6, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Fred Nekouee Process Server: Eastern Missouri Legal Services (Vincze, Robert)
November 6, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants with receipt number 0865-6859997, in the amount of $400 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Fred Nekouee. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Summons Def. Arnold Park Mall, LLC, #4 Summons Def. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.)(Vincze, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nekouee v. Arnold Park Mall, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arnold Park Mall, LLC
Represented By: T. Christopher Bailey
Represented By: Lauren B. Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Represented By: Brandan P. Mueller
Represented By: Shannon David Peters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fred Nekouee
Represented By: Robert Joseph Vincze
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?