Coleman v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc.
| Daniel J. Coleman, Sr. |
| Real Time Resolutions, Inc. |
| 4:2018cv01965 |
| November 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Audrey G Fleissig |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Docket Text ORDER: Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice; SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on January 11, 2019. (SAA)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION for Dismissal with Prejudice by Plaintiff Daniel J. Coleman, Sr. (Gee, Ethan) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file, on or before February 8, 2019, dismissal papers dismissing the case. Failure to comply may result in the dismissal of the case by the Court. ( Dismissal Paper(s) due by 2/8/2019.). Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 12/11/2018. (KCB)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement by Daniel J. Coleman, Sr (Gee, Ethan) |
| Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Ethan William Gee for Plaintiff Daniel J. Coleman, Sr. (Gee, Ethan) |
|
Filing 6
Docket Text ORDER Re: #5 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) by Defendant Real Time Resolutions, Inc.; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on November 29, 2018. (SAA)
|
| Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) by Defendant Real Time Resolutions, Inc.. (Dickinson, Joshua) |
| Filing 4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, St. Louis County, Missouri, filed by Daniel J. Coleman, Sr.(BAK) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Real Time Resolutions, Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Dickinson, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Real Time Resolutions, Inc.. Parent companies: Real Time Group, Inc.,. (Dickinson, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis County Circuit Court, case number 18SL-AC28320, with receipt number 0865-6888710, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Real Time Resolutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Ex A - State Court Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form)(Dickinson, Joshua) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Coleman v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel J. Coleman, Sr. | |
| Represented By: | Richard A. Voytas, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Ethan William Gee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Real Time Resolutions, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Joshua C. Dickinson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
