Laney v. Abrazo Arrowhead Campus
Dwight D. Laney, Sr. |
Abrazo Arrowhead Campus |
4:2018cv02000 |
November 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Rodney W Sippel |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 1/17/2019. (NEP) |
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 6. Thu Jan 17 14:59:44 CST 2019 (Phillips, Nicole) |
Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Dwight Laney, Sr. Returned document(s): #4 Memorandum & Order. Could not verify new address and mail was not resent. (KXS) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs is GRANTED. #2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this memorandum and order, plaintiff shall submit an amended complaint in accordance with the instructions set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mail to plaintiff a blank employment discrimination complaint. Plaintiff may request additional forms as needed. If plaintiff fails to timely comply with this memorandum and order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice and without further notice. [A COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FORM MAILED THIS DATE} Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 11/29/18. (KEK) |
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 4. Thu Nov 29 11:09:59 CST 2018 (Kratzer, Katie) |
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Wed Nov 28 16:01:14 CST 2018 (admin,) |
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (MFG) |
Case Opening Notification: All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable Rodney W. Sippel. (MFG) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Dwight D. Laney, Sr. (MFG) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Dwight D. Laney, Sr. (MFG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Abrazo Arrowhead Campus Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Dwight D. Laney, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 EEOC Right to Sue Charging Letter)(MFG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Laney v. Abrazo Arrowhead Campus | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Abrazo Arrowhead Campus | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Dwight D. Laney, Sr. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.