Laird v. Cassady
Scanning Program - Boonville Correctional Center |
Stacey Laird |
Jay Cassady |
4:2018cv02078 |
December 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Henry Edward Autrey |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Missouri Western; Case Number 4:18-cv-00960. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. Case transferred in electronically.(DLB) |
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DLB) |
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Thu Dec 13 10:01:18 CST 2018 (admin,) |
Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Henry E. Autrey. (DLB) |
Case electronically transferred to District of Eastern District of Missouri. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Richard, Tracey) |
|
RECEIPT number KCMO074508 in the amount of $5.00 issued to Stacey Laird for habeas fee. (Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Stacey Laird. (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Stacey Laird. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits)(Davies, Cindy) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/6/2018: #2 Exhibit) (Davies, Cindy). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.