Jiang v. Nielsen et al
Rev. Xiu Hui "Joseph" Jiang and Xiu Hui "Joseph" Jiang |
Sec'y DHS Kirstjen Nielsen, District Director David Douglas, Kirstjen Nielsen and David Douglas |
4:2018cv02084 |
December 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
John A Ross |
Other Statutory Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Regan C. Hildebrand for Defendants David Douglas, Kirstjen Nielsen. (Hildebrand, Regan) |
Summons Issued as to defendant David Douglas, Kirstjen Nielsen, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. The summons were emailed to tim@immigrantlawcenter.com. (KKS) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM Request to Issue Summonses by Plaintiff Xiu Hui "Joseph" Jiang. (Attachments: #1 Summons Acting Atty Gen summons, #2 Summons DHS summons, #3 Summons District Director summons, #4 Summons US Atty summons)(Wichmer, Timothy) |
Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge John A. Ross. Service will issue when proper service documents are filed. (BAK) |
Receipt: $ 400.00, receipt number 0865-6928065 for Civil Filing Fee. (BAK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus against defendant Kirstjen Nielsen Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Xiu Hui "Joseph" Jiang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Original Filing Form)(Wichmer, Timothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.