Chavez et al v. Monsanto Company
| Gaudencio Chavez and Barbara Carter |
| Monsanto Company |
| 4:2018cv02143 |
| December 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Patricia L Cohen |
| John A Ross |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER VACATING CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDERS AND VACATING THE MARCH 28, 2019, HEARING SESSION ORDER. Conditional transfer orders were filed in the actions on the attached schedule on December 6, 2018, January 4, 2019, and January 17, 2019, respectively. Prior to expiration of those orders' 7- day stay of transmittal, plaintiffs filed notices of opposition to the proposed transfer. Plaintiffs later filed motions and briefs to vacate the conditional transfer orders. The Panel has now been advised that these actions have been remanded to the Twenty-First Judicial Circuit Court for St. Louis, County, Missouri. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Panel's conditional transfer orders designated as "CTO-113, 116 and 118" filed on December 6, 2018, January 4, 2019, and January 17, 2019, respectively, are VACATED insofar as they relate to these actions. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Hearing Session Order and the attached Schedule filed on February 13, 2019, are VACATED insofar as they relate to these actions. Signed by Jeffery N. Lthi, Clerk of the Panel. (DJO)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER OF REMAND - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Doc. #8 ), is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED to the Circuit Court for the Twenty-First Judicial Circuit Court, St. Louis County, State of Missouri. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Expedite Briefing and Ruling on Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Doc. #10 ), is DISMISSED as moot.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 2/14/19. (KKS) Mailed certified copy of order and a docket sheet to state court on 2/14/2019 (KKS).
|
| Filing 18 CONSENT to Remand to State Court by Defendant Monsanto Company.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Hansell, Erik) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Supplemental Authority re #8 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to the County of St. Louis, MO by Plaintiffs Barbara Carter, Gaudencio Chavez . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Holland, Eric) |
| Filing 16 REPLY (to termed motion) re #10 MOTION to Expedite Briefing and Ruling on Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand and Certificate of Service filed by Plaintiffs Barbara Carter, Gaudencio Chavez. (Holland, Eric) |
| Filing 15 REPLY re #8 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to the County of St. Louis, MO and Certificate of Service filed by Plaintiffs Barbara Carter, Gaudencio Chavez. (Holland, Eric) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Expedite Briefing and Ruling on Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand filed by Defendant Monsanto Company. (Hansell, Erik) |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to the County of St. Louis, MO filed by Defendant Monsanto Company. (Hansell, Erik) |
| Filing 12 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen termed. Case reassigned to District Judge John A. Ross for all further proceedings (KXS) |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #10 MOTION to Expedite Briefing and Ruling on Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiffs Barbara Carter, Gaudencio Chavez. (Holland, Eric) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Expedite Briefing and Ruling on Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand by Plaintiffs Barbara Carter, Gaudencio Chavez. (Holland, Eric) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #8 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to the County of St. Louis, MO filed by Plaintiffs Barbara Carter, Gaudencio Chavez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Holland, Eric) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to the County of St. Louis, MO by Plaintiffs Barbara Carter, Gaudencio Chavez. (Holland, Eric) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Monsanto Company Sent To: State Court - Executed (Hansell, Erik) |
| Filing 6 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Monsanto Company.(Hansell, Erik) |
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENTAL State Court Docket Sheet re #1 Notice of Removal Petition. (JWD) |
| Filing 3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: St. Louis County Circuit Court, filed by Gaudencio Chavez, Barbara Carter.(JWD) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Monsanto Company Sent To: Plaintiff (Hansell, Erik) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St Louis County Circuit Court, case number 18SL-CC04822, with receipt number 0865-6945503, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Monsanto Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form)(Hansell, Erik) |
| Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable Patricia L. Cohen. (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
