United States of America v. Rhines
| United States of America |
| Ronnie D. Rhines |
| 4:2018mc00616 |
| September 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Catherine D Perry |
| Miscellaneous Case |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 DECLARATION filed by Petitioner United States of America re #7 Memorandum Regarding Service by Mail. (Shaw, Jane) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM re 4 Docket Text Order Regarding Service by Mail by Petitioner United States of America. (Shaw, Jane) |
Filing 6
SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. (See Full Order.) Respondent did not appear at the hearing on November 16, 2018. The Assistant United States Attorney explained the attempts at service made and the fact that respondent was served by mail. The summons which is the subject of this case had been personally served on respondent earlier. The Assistant United States Attorney requested that the Court reset this hearing to give respondent another attempt to comply. I will continue the hearing and reset it for Thursday, December 13, 2018 at 10:30 a.m. Respondent is warned that should he fail to appear the Court will consider requests that respondent be held in contempt of court and/or for financial sanctions and/or for a writ of body attachment, directing the United States Marshal's Service to take respondent into custody and deliver him to the Court. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent, Ronnie D. Rhines, must appear before the undersigned, in Courtroom No. 14-South, of the Thomas Eagleton U.S. Courthouse, 111 South 10th Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63102, on Thursday, December 13, 2018 at 10:30 a.m. to show cause why he should not be compelled to comply with the Internal Revenue Service summons served on him on June 8, 2018. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this Order to defendants last known address as shown on the docket sheet, and petitioner shall also make all reasonable attempts to serve defendant with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent Ronnie D. Rhines is specifically warned that sanctions as set out above may be imposed if he again fails to appear as ordered. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 11/16/2018. (CBL)
|
| Filing 5 Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Catherine D. Perry: Show Cause Hearing held on 11/16/2018. Respondent Rhines did not appear for hearing. The Government asks for a continuance. Order to follow. (Court Reporter:Gayle Madden, Gayle_Madden@moed.uscourts.gov, 314-244-7987) (FTR Gold: No) (MCB) |
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 6. Order sent to Mr. Rhines at address on docket sheet. Fri Nov 16 16:38:17 CST 2018 (Long, Carol)
|
|
Filing 4
Docket Text ORDER: Re #3 MOTION for Leave to Serve Respondent by Mail by Petitioner United States of America; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 10/12/18. (EAB)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Serve Respondent by Mail by Petitioner United States of America. (Shaw, Jane) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent, Ronnie D. Rhines, appear before the undersigned, in Courtroom No. 14-South, of the Thomas Eagleton U.S. Courthouse, 111 South 10th Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63102, on Friday, November 16, 2018 at 3:30 p.m. to show cause why he should not be compelled to comply with the Internal Revenue Service summons served on him on June 8, 2018. It is further ORDERED that a copy of this Order, together with the Petition and its Exhibits, be personally served on respondent on or before October 16, 2018. It is further ORDERED that within 5 days of service of copies of this Order, the Petition and its Exhibits, respondent shall file and serve on petitioner a written response to the Petition. It is further ORDERED that Revenue Officer Mark J. Boston or his delegate is especially appointed to serve a copy of this Order, and the Petition and its Exhibits attached thereto on respondent. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 9/27/18. (EAB)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 2. copy sent to non-electronic party on this date. Thu Sep 27 12:06:54 CDT 2018 (Brown, Erica)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION to Enforce IRS Summons , filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Summons, #2 Exhibit 2-Declaration, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Shaw, Jane) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Catherine D. Perry. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Rhines | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Jane B. Shaw |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Ronnie D. Rhines | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
