LADS Network Solutions, Inc. v. Agilis Systems, LLC et al
| LADS Network Solutions, Inc. |
| Agilis Systems, LLC, Archlogix, LLC and Gilead Group, LLC |
| 4:2019cv00011 |
| January 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| John M Bodenhausen |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff LADS Network Solutions, Inc. Process Server: HPS Process Service and Investigations (Rabenberg, Keith) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff LADS Network Solutions, Inc.. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Rabenberg, Keith) |
| Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Keith A. Rabenberg for Plaintiff LADS Network Solutions, Inc.. (Rabenberg, Keith) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Agilis Systems, LLC, Archlogix, LLC, Gilead Group, LLC with receipt number 0865-6954929, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by LADS Network Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Registration, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form Filing Form, #4 Summons to Agilis Systems, LLC, #5 Summons to Archlogix, LLC, #6 Summons to Gilead Group, LLC)(Rabenberg, Keith) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
