Stricker Wyss v. Kowalik
| Pauline Stricker Wyss |
| Wendy H. Kowalik |
| 4:2019cv00109 |
| January 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Noelle C Collins |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 First MOTION to Amend/Correct #15 First MOTION to Stay Rule 41(d) Motion Exhibits A, B, C, D by Defendant Wendy H. Kowalik. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A Dismissal, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B First Petition, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C Second Petition, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D Invoice)(George, Michael) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #15 First MOTION to Stay Rule 41(d) Motion filed by Plaintiff Pauline Stricker Wyss. (Osborne, David) |
| Filing 15 First MOTION to Stay Rule 41(d) Motion by Defendant Wendy H. Kowalik. (George, Michael) |
| Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Phelps County, Missouri Circuit Court filed by Plaintiff Pauline Stricker Wyss. (Osborne, David) |
Filing 13
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Second Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. #11 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's response (Doc. #12 ) filed today, March 4, 2019, is therefore deemed timely filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins on 03/04/2019. (KBL)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Phelps County, Missouri Circuit Court, #11 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Phelps County, Missouri Circuit Court , #7 MOTION for Hearing filed by Defendant Wendy H. Kowalik. (George, Michael) |
| Filing 11 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Phelps County, Missouri Circuit Court by Defendant Wendy H. Kowalik. (George, Michael) |
|
Filing 10
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Extend Time to Reply to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. #9 ) is GRANTED. Defendant shall file her response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand on or before March 3, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins on 02/28/2019. (KBL)
|
| Filing 9 First MOTION for Extension #6 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Phelps County, Missouri Circuit Court of: Time to Reply to Motion to Remand, First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Phelps County, Missouri Circuit Court by Defendant Wendy H. Kowalik. (George, Michael) |
| Filing 8 FULL CONSENT has been received by Defendant Wendy H. Kowalik, Plaintiff Pauline Stricker Wyss. (BRP) |
| Notice from Clerk instructing Defendant Wendy H. Kowalik to submit Notice regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (AFC) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Hearing by Plaintiff Pauline Stricker Wyss. (Osborne, David) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Phelps County, Missouri Circuit Court by Plaintiff Pauline Stricker Wyss. (Osborne, David) |
| Filing 5 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW) |
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENTAL - State Court Docket Sheet. (BAK) |
| Filing 3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, Phelps County, Missouri, filed by Pauline Stricker Wyss.(BAK) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Wendy H. Kowalik Sent To: Plaintiff (BAK) |
| Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Direct-Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins. (BAK) |
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Phelps County Circuit Court, case number 18PH-CV02211, with receipt number 0865-7000605, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Wendy H. Kowalik. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit First Petition 18PH-CV01801, #2 Exhibit Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff, #3 Exhibit Second Petition 18PH-CV02211, #4 Exhibit Order of Dismissal by Judge Ross, #5 Exhibit Return of Service for Second Petition, #6 Civil Cover Sheet , #7 Original Filing Form , #8 Exhibit Notice to Phelps County Circuit Court of Removal, #9 Exhibit Notice to Plaintiff of Removal)(George, Michael)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stricker Wyss v. Kowalik | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wendy H. Kowalik | |
| Represented By: | Michael T. George |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pauline Stricker Wyss | |
| Represented By: | David A. Osborne |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
