Quinlan v. Party City Corporation
Janet M. Quinlan |
Party City Corporation |
4:2019cv00163 |
February 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Catherine D Perry |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 REPLY re #10 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to ST. LOUIS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT filed by Plaintiff Janet M. Quinlan. (Quinlan, Michael) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to ST. LOUIS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT filed by Defendant Party City Corporation. (Baty, John) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #10 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to ST. LOUIS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT filed by Plaintiff Janet M. Quinlan. (Quinlan, Michael) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to ST. LOUIS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT by Plaintiff Janet M. Quinlan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit AFFIDAVIT OF MICHAEL D QUINLAN)(Quinlan, Michael) |
Filing 9 ENTRY of Appearance by John Francis Baty for Defendant Party City Corporation. (Baty, John) |
Filing 8 ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CONFERENCE. This case is assigned to Track: 2 (Standard). Joint Scheduling Plan due by 4/11/2019. Rule 16 Conference set for 4/18/2019 at 10:30 AM in Chambers before District Judge Catherine D. Perry. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 2/11/19. (EAB) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Party City Corporation.(Baty, Lee) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Party City Corporation Sent To: State Court - Executed (Baty, Lee) |
Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL State Court Docket Sheet. (MFG) |
Filing 4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, filed by Janet M. Quinlan.(MFG) |
Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Party City Corporation. Parent companies: Party City Holdco Inc., Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Baty, Lee) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Party City Corporation Sent To: Plaintiff (Baty, Lee) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis County, case number 18sl-cc04409, with receipt number 0865-7013415, in the amount of $400 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Party City Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(Baty, Lee) |
Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Catherine D. Perry. (MFG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Quinlan v. Party City Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Party City Corporation | |
Represented By: | Lee M. Baty |
Represented By: | John Francis Baty |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Janet M. Quinlan | |
Represented By: | Michael D. Quinlan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.