Quinlan v. Party City Corporation
Plaintiff: Janet M. Quinlan
Defendant: Party City Corporation
Case Number: 4:2019cv00163
Filed: February 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Catherine D Perry
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2019 Filing 13 REPLY re #10 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to ST. LOUIS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT filed by Plaintiff Janet M. Quinlan. (Quinlan, Michael)
March 13, 2019 Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to ST. LOUIS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT filed by Defendant Party City Corporation. (Baty, John)
March 4, 2019 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #10 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to ST. LOUIS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT filed by Plaintiff Janet M. Quinlan. (Quinlan, Michael)
March 4, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to ST. LOUIS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT by Plaintiff Janet M. Quinlan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit AFFIDAVIT OF MICHAEL D QUINLAN)(Quinlan, Michael)
March 1, 2019 Filing 9 ENTRY of Appearance by John Francis Baty for Defendant Party City Corporation. (Baty, John)
February 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CONFERENCE. This case is assigned to Track: 2 (Standard). Joint Scheduling Plan due by 4/11/2019. Rule 16 Conference set for 4/18/2019 at 10:30 AM in Chambers before District Judge Catherine D. Perry. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 2/11/19. (EAB)
February 8, 2019 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Party City Corporation.(Baty, Lee)
February 7, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Party City Corporation Sent To: State Court - Executed (Baty, Lee)
February 1, 2019 Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL State Court Docket Sheet. (MFG)
February 1, 2019 Filing 4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, filed by Janet M. Quinlan.(MFG)
February 1, 2019 Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Party City Corporation. Parent companies: Party City Holdco Inc., Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Baty, Lee)
February 1, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Party City Corporation Sent To: Plaintiff (Baty, Lee)
February 1, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis County, case number 18sl-cc04409, with receipt number 0865-7013415, in the amount of $400 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Party City Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(Baty, Lee)
February 1, 2019 Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Catherine D. Perry. (MFG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Quinlan v. Party City Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Party City Corporation
Represented By: Lee M. Baty
Represented By: John Francis Baty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janet M. Quinlan
Represented By: Michael D. Quinlan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?