Ruth Gurley v. Monsanto Company et al
| Ruth Gurley |
| John Does 1-50 and Monsanto Company |
| 4:2019cv00192 |
| February 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| John A Ross |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Ruth Gurley Process Server: Metro One/Bob Thomure (MFG) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Ruth Gurley. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (MFG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant John Does 1-50, Monsanto Company with receipt number 0865-7028247, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Ruth Gurley, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Douglas N. Gurley. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Attachment Notice of Disclosure of Organizational Interests, #4 Attachment Notice of Intent to Use Process Server, #5 Summons)(Holland, Eric) |
| Case Opening Notification: 1 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to Eric D. Holland. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge John A. Ross. (MFG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
