North American Satellite Corp. et al v. Pacific LPG Corporation
| Insite Platform Partners, Inc., North American Satellite Corp., Rick Humphrey and Insite Platform Partners, Inc. doing business as North American Satellite Corp. |
| Pacific LPG Corporation and Pacific LPG Corporation doing business as Pacific Propane |
| 4:2019cv00210 |
| February 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| John A Ross |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER OF DISMISSAL with prejudice re: #14 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Plaintiffs Rick Humphrey, Insite Platform Partners, Inc., North American Satellite Corp. SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 4/16/2019. (CLO)
|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Plaintiffs Rick Humphrey, Insite Platform Partners, Inc., North American Satellite Corp.. (Protzman, Andrew) |
|
Filing 13
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction the claims of Plaintiff InSite (Unopposed) by Plaintiff Insite Platform Partners, Inc.. (Protzman, Andrew) ; ORDERED GRANTED( Response to Court due by 4/9/2019.). Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 2/26/2019. (CLO)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction the claims of Plaintiff InSite (Unopposed) by Plaintiff Insite Platform Partners, Inc.. (Protzman, Andrew) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint by Pacific LPG Corporation.(Magee, Thomas) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction the claims of Plaintiff InSite filed by Defendant Pacific LPG Corporation. (Magee, Thomas) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction the claims of Plaintiff InSite by Defendant Pacific LPG Corporation. (Magee, Thomas) |
| Filing 8 Letter to attorney Andrew Bentley Protzman from Clerk Re:Admission To Practice (MFG) |
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENTAL State Court Docket Sheet. (MFG) |
| Filing 6 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Charles County, filed by North American Satellite Corp., Rick Humphrey, Insite Platform Partners, Inc..(MFG) |
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Notice of Removal Petition, State Court File by Defendant Pacific LPG Corporation. (Magee, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Pacific LPG Corporation Sent To: Plaintiff (Magee, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Pacific LPG Corporation. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Magee, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Thomas J. Magee for Defendant Pacific LPG Corporation. (Magee, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Charles County, case number 1911-CC00025, with receipt number 0865-7033422, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Pacific LPG Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form)(Magee, Thomas) |
| Case Opening Notification: All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable John A. Ross. (MFG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
