Taylor v. Asbury St. Louis Lex, LLC
| Stacy Taylor |
| Asbury St. Louis Lex, LLC d/b/a Plaza Lexus and Asbury St. Louis Lex, LLC |
| 4:2019cv00282 |
| February 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Jean C Hamilton |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER ORDER BY CONSENT GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPELARBITRATION AND STAYING ACTION PENDING COMPLETION OF ARBITRATIONThe parties having filed a joint motion consenting to the arbitration of this matter and staying ~he action pending arbjtration, the Court hereby enters its Order: (1) granting Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action Pending Completion of Arbitration ("Motion to Compel, Arbitration," Doc. 4), (2) appointing United States Arbitration & Mediation to administer the arbitration, and (3) staying the above-captioned case pending the completion of arbitration.The patties shall file a joint status report within ten days of a written decision regarding the outcome of the arbitration proceedings. #10 Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 4/3/19. (CLA)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE Proposed Order: by Plaintiff Stacy Taylor re #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration (Brody, Bryan) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT to #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration by Plaintiff Stacy Taylor.. (Brody, Bryan) |
|
Filing 9
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration by Plaintiff Stacy Taylor. (Brody, Bryan) filed by Stacy Taylor ; ORDERED GRANTED JCH. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 3/7/19. (CLA)
|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration by Plaintiff Stacy Taylor. (Brody, Bryan) |
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENTAL State Court Docket Sheet. (MFG) |
| Filing 6 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, filed by Stacy Taylor.(MFG) |
| Case Opening Notification: All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable Jean C. Hamilton. (MFG) |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendant Asbury St. Louis Lex, LLC d/b/a Plaza Lexus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Kraushaar, Corey) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration by Defendant Asbury St. Louis Lex, LLC d/b/a Plaza Lexus. (Kraushaar, Corey) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Asbury St. Louis Lex, LLC d/b/a Plaza Lexus Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Attachment Notice of Removal)(Kraushaar, Corey) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Asbury St. Louis Lex, LLC d/b/a Plaza Lexus. Parent companies: N/A, Subsidiaries: N/A, Publicly held company: N/A,. (Kraushaar, Corey) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis County Circuit Court, case number 19SL-CC00128, with receipt number 0865-7051637, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Asbury St. Louis Lex, LLC d/b/a Plaza Lexus. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #3 Attachment State Court File and Docket Sheet)(Kraushaar, Corey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
