Sours et al v. Precythe et al
Eugene V. LaMartina and William Scott Sours |
Cindy Griffith, John Ashcroft, Stanley Payne, Anne L. Precythe, Alana Boyles and Gil Long |
4:2019cv00441 |
March 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Jean C Hamilton |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Eugene V. LaMartina. (DJO) |
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DJO) |
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Wed Mar 13 12:01:28 CDT 2019 (admin,) |
Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Jean C. Hamilton. (DJO) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Eugene V. LaMartina. (DJO) |
Filing 3 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff William Scott Sours. (DJO) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff William Scott Sours. (DJO) |
Filing 1 DCM COMPLAINT against defendant John Ashcroft, Alana Boyles, Cindy Griffith, Gil Long, Stanley Payne, Anne L. Precythe, filed by William Scott Sours, Eugene V. LaMartina. (Attachments: #1 Correspondence, #2 Judge Assignment Label, #3 Envelope)(DJO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.