National Roofing Industry Pension Plan et al v. Jourdain Roofing Company

Plaintiff: National Roofing Industry Pension Plan, United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Local Union No. 2, AFL-CIO, Roofers and Waterproofers Research and Education Joint Trust Fund and Kinsey Robinson
Defendant: Jourdain Roofing Company
Case Number: 4:2019cv01305
Filed: May 14, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Ronnie L White
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29:1145
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 14, 2019 Case Opening Notification: 1 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to attorney Matthew J. Gierse. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Ronnie L. White. (BAK)
May 14, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiffs National Roofing Industry Pension Plan, Kinsey Robinson, Roofers and Waterproofers Research and Education Joint Trust Fund, United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Local Union No. 2, AFL-CIO Process Server: John Frederick Investigations (Gierse, Matthew)
May 14, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Jourdain Roofing Company with receipt number 0865-7207705, in the amount of $400 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Local Union No. 2, AFL-CIO, National Roofing Industry Pension Plan, Kinsey Robinson, Roofers and Waterproofers Research and Education Joint Trust Fund. (Attachments: #1 Summons , #2 Original Filing Form , #3 Civil Cover Sheet )(Gierse, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: National Roofing Industry Pension Plan et al v. Jourdain Roofing Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: National Roofing Industry Pension Plan
Represented By: Matthew J. Gierse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Local Union No. 2, AFL-CIO
Represented By: Matthew J. Gierse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roofers and Waterproofers Research and Education Joint Trust Fund
Represented By: Matthew J. Gierse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kinsey Robinson
Represented By: Matthew J. Gierse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jourdain Roofing Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?