Saxon v. Green et al
Plaintiff: Janet Saxon
Defendant: Jake Dillon, Tom Green and Key Sport
Case Number: 4:2019cv01612
Filed: June 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Jean C Hamilton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 3, 2019 Filing 10 Summons Issued as to defendant Key Sport. The summons was hand delivered to USMS. (AAS)
July 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to issue process or cause process to issue on the complaint. Defendant Key Sport shall be served with process through its registered agent: Tom Green, 1300 South Bishop, Rolla MO, 65401.. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 07/03/2019. (AAS)
July 3, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 9. Wed Jul 3 16:25:25 CDT 2019 (Shepard, Alicia)
June 27, 2019 Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant Key Sport Amendment to #1 Complaint Summons(es) issued none, Waivers issued none, Consents issued none, Jury Demand demand,, filed by Janet Saxon. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Janet Saxon.(KJS)
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel [Doc.#3] is DENIED without prejudice. #3 Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 6/20/19. (CLA)
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs claims against the individual defendants Jake Dillon and Tom Green are DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to substitute the name of her employer as the proper defendant in this action. She shall do so by filing an amended complaint on a court-provided form against her former employer. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall provide plaintiff with a form complaint for filing employment discrimination claims. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will hold the dismissal of the individual defendants in abeyance pending plaintiffs substitution of the real party in interest, for the next thirty (30) days. #2 Saxon ( Response to Court due by 7/20/2019.) Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 6/20/19. cc: forms mailed.(CLA) (Main Document 6 replaced on 6/20/2019) (CLA).
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 6. Thu Jun 20 12:28:28 CDT 2019 (Abrams, Carrie)
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 7. Thu Jun 20 12:33:46 CDT 2019 (Abrams, Carrie)
June 14, 2019 Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint, #4 Memorandum & Order, by Plaintiff Janet Saxon. (CLA)
June 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall submit a copy of both her charge of discrimination as well as a copy of her EEOC right-to-sue letter within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without further proceedings. Response to Court due by 6/26/2019.. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 6/5/19. (KJS)
June 5, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 4. Wed Jun 5 14:53:05 CDT 2019 (Shirley, Kelley)
June 4, 2019 Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Jean C. Hamilton. (JWD)
June 4, 2019 ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD)
June 4, 2019 ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue Jun 4 14:01:14 CDT 2019 (admin,)
June 3, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Janet Saxon. (JWD)
June 3, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Janet Saxon. (JWD)
June 3, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Jake Dillon, Tom Green Jury Demand, filed by Janet Saxon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet (not completed by plaintiff), #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Envelope)(JWD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Saxon v. Green et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jake Dillon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tom Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Key Sport
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janet Saxon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?