Patrico et al v. BJC Health System et al
| Joseph A Patrico, Kathleen E Patrico, Joseph A. Patrico and Kathleen E. Patrico |
| BJC Health System d/b/a BJC HealthCare, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and BJC Health System |
| 4:2019cv01665 |
| June 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Stephen N Limbaugh |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 MOTION for Leave to File Reply to Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition Out of Time by Defendant BJC Health System. (Makepeace, Russell) |
| Filing 22 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #19 MOTION to Dismiss Party (for Failure to State a Claim) filed by Plaintiffs Joseph A. Patrico, Kathleen E. Patrico. (Wynne, John) |
Filing 21
ORDER: Case reassigned to District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr for all further proceedings. District Judge Rodney W. Sippel no longer assigned to case. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 7/11/19. (KEK)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the undersigned United States District Judge is disqualified from handling any matters in this case, and the Clerk of Court shall randomly reassign the case to another judge. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 7/10/19. (KEK)
|
| Filing 19 MOTION to Dismiss Party (for Failure to State a Claim) by Defendant BJC Health System. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Makepeace, Russell) |
| Filing 18 ENTRY of Appearance by Russell L. Makepeace for Defendant BJC Health System. (Makepeace, Russell) |
| Filing 17 REPLY to Response to Motion re #10 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to St. Louis County Circuit Court filed by Plaintiffs Joseph A. Patrico, Kathleen E. Patrico. (Wynne, John) |
|
Filing 16
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply in support of its Motion to Strike Immaterial Allegations by Defendant Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (Jones, Denyse) filed by Intuitive Surgical, Inc.; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 7/2/19. (KEK)
|
| Filing 15 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #7 MOTION to Strike Immaterial Allegations in Petition filed by Defendant Intuitive Surgical, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Jones, Denyse) |
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to St. Louis County Circuit Court filed by Defendant Intuitive Surgical, Inc.. (Jones, Denyse) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply in support of its Motion to Strike Immaterial Allegations by Defendant Intuitive Surgical, Inc.. (Jones, Denyse) |
| Filing 12 ENTRY of Appearance by Christine F. Miller for Defendant Intuitive Surgical, Inc.. (Miller, Christine) |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Strike Immaterial Allegations in Petition filed by Plaintiffs Joseph A. Patrico, Kathleen E. Patrico. (Wynne, John) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to St. Louis County Circuit Court by Plaintiffs Joseph A. Patrico, Kathleen E. Patrico. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit BJCs Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit BJCs Memo in Support of its Motion to Dimiss, #3 Exhibit Memo Setting BJCs Motion to Dimiss for Hearing, #4 Exhibit BJCs Notice of Hearing)(Wynne, John) |
| Filing 9 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Rodney W. Sippel for all further proceedings (AFC) |
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #7 MOTION to Strike Immaterial Allegations in Petition filed by Defendant Intuitive Surgical, Inc.. (Jones, Denyse) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Strike Immaterial Allegations in Petition by Defendant Intuitive Surgical, Inc.. (Jones, Denyse) |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Intuitive Surgical, Inc... (Jones, Denyse) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Jones, Denyse) |
| Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW) |
| Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable Noelle C. Collins. (JWD) |
| Filing 3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: St. Louis County Circuit Court, filed by Kathleen E. Patrico, Joseph A. Patrico. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A)(JWD) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Jones, Denyse) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuti Court of St. Louis County, case number 19SL-CC01565, with receipt number AMOEDC-7269039, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Intuitive Surgical, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court File, #2 Exhibit B-2015 Petition, #3 Exhibit C-Plaintiffs Response to Interrogatories, #4 Exhibit D-Order Granting Summary Judgment, #5 Exhibit E-Voluntary Dismissal, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Original Filing Form)(Jones, Denyse) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
