Mungenast Investments, LLC v. Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc.
Mungenast Investments, LLC |
Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc. |
4:2019cv01697 |
June 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Stephen N Limbaugh |
Contract: Franchise |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ENTRY of Appearance by Stephen William Carman for Plaintiff Mungenast Investments, LLC, Counter Defendant Mungenast Investments, LLC. (Carman, Stephen) |
Filing 13 ENTRY of Appearance by Aaron D. French for Plaintiff Mungenast Investments, LLC, Counter Defendant Mungenast Investments, LLC. (French, Aaron) |
Filing 12 Defendant Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc.'s ANSWER to Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Preliminary and Permanent Injunction, COUNTERCLAIM against plaintiff Mungenast Investments, LLC by Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Launch Assistance Letter, #2 Exhibit B - May 9, 2019 Letter)(Bledsoe, Stephen) |
![]() |
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) by Defendant Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc.. (Bledsoe, Stephen) |
![]() |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's State Court Petition by Defendant Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc.. (Bledsoe, Stephen) |
Filing 7 REASSIGNMENT ORDER (GJL). District Judge Rodney W. Sippel no longer assigned to case. Case reassigned to District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr for all further proceedings. (KXS) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM TO THE COURT re: TRO Hearing by Plaintiff Mungenast Investments, LLC. (O'Leary, Timothy) Modified on 6/14/2019 (MRC). |
***REMARK: On 6/14/2019 Pltff's counsel filed a Motion for TRO. Counsel subsequently filed a Memorandum to the Court indicating that plaintiff does not intend to notice its Motion for TRO for a hearing at this time. If circumstances warrant it, Plaintiff reserves its right to notice its motion for hearing in the future. Per the Court's direction, the Motion for TRO is hereby terminated as a pending motion. (LMY) |
Case Opening Notification: All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable Rodney W. Sippel. (JWD) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiff Mungenast Investments, LLC. (BAK) |
Filing 4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, St. Louis County, Missouri, filed by Mungenast Investments, LLC.(BAK) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Bledsoe, Stephen) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc.. Parent companies: Mitsubishi Motors Corporation of Japan, Subsidiaries: None not wholly owned, Publicly held company: No,. (Bledsoe, Stephen) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL of Defendant Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc. from Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri, case number 19SL-CC02325, with receipt number AMOEDC-7277415, in the amount of $400 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bledsoe, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.