Ford v. Pine Lawn Food Market, Inc. et al
Nakisha Ford |
Pine Lawn Food Market, Inc., Sylvester Caldwell, Mazen "Mario" Samad, Steven Blakeney, Akram "Sam" Samad and Pine Lawn City of |
4:2019cv01708 |
June 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Stephen R Clark |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #23 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Steven Blakeney. (Schriener, Kevin) |
Filing 23 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendant Steven Blakeney. (Schriener, Kevin) |
Filing 22 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #21 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal Petition, by Defendant Steven Blakeney. (CLO) filed by Steven Blakeney ; ORDERED GRANTED( Response to Court due by 7/26/2019.)No further extensions for this deadline. Counsel is reminded to file any motion for extension prior to the deadline. Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 7/22/2019. (CLO) |
Filing 21 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal Petition, by Defendant Steven Blakeney. (CLO) |
Filing 20 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #19 MOTION for Leave to File Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Responsive Pleading One-Day Out of Time by Defendant Steven Blakeney. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment Motion for Extension of Time)(Schriener, Kevin) filed by Steven Blakeney ; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 7/22/2019. (CLO) |
Filing 19 MOTION for Leave to File Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Responsive Pleading One-Day Out of Time by Defendant Steven Blakeney. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Motion for Extension of Time)(Schriener, Kevin) |
Filing 18 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following cases shall be transferred to the Honorable Stephen R. Clark, U.S. District Judge. All deadlines previously set remain in effect unless otherwise ordered by the Court.. The order will not be added to the website. Signed by Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 07/11/2019. (AAS) (Main Document 18 replaced on 7/15/2019) (LMY). |
Filing 17 Docket Text ORDER: as to Steven Blakeney Re: #16 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or other Responsive Pleading by Defendant Steven Blakeney. (Schriener, Kevin) filed by Steven Blakeney ; ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED UP TO AND INCLUDING JULY 19, 2019, (Steven Blakeney answer due 7/19/2019.) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 7/8/19. (KJS) |
Filing 16 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or other Responsive Pleading by Defendant Steven Blakeney. (Schriener, Kevin) |
Filing 15 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #10 MOTION to Dismiss Case , #6 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Plaintiff Nakisha Ford. (Tate, Rufus) filed by Nakisha Ford ; ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED UP TO AND INCLUDING UP TO AND INCLUDING JULY 12, 2019. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 7/1/19. (KJS) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #10 MOTION to Dismiss Case , #6 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Plaintiff Nakisha Ford. (Tate, Rufus) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Pine Lawn Food Market, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment) by Defendant Pine Lawn Food Market, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(Maloney, James) |
Filing 12 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or other Responsive Pleading by Defendant Steven Blakeney. (Schriener, Kevin) filed by Steven Blakeney ; ORDERED GRANTED.. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 06/24/2019. (AAS) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #10 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Pine Lawn City of. (Hill, Blake) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendant Pine Lawn City of. (Hill, Blake) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or other Responsive Pleading by Defendant Steven Blakeney. (Schriener, Kevin) |
Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Michael L. Belancio for Defendants Pine Lawn Food Market, Inc., Akram "Sam" Samad, Mazen "Mario" Samad. (Belancio, Michael) |
Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by James P. Maloney for Defendants Pine Lawn Food Market, Inc., Akram "Sam" Samad, Mazen "Mario" Samad. (Maloney, James) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendants Pine Lawn Food Market, Inc., Akram "Sam" Samad, Mazen "Mario" Samad. (Maloney, James) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Pine Lawn City of Sent To: State Court - Executed (Hill, Blake) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Pine Lawn City of Sent To: State Court - Executed (Hill, Blake) |
Filing 3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, St. Louis County, Missouri, filed by Nakisha Ford.(BAK) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Pine Lawn City of Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Attachment NOTICE TO ADVERSE PARTY OF FILING OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT)(Hill, Blake) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of St. Louis County, case number 18SL-CC01453, with receipt number AMOEDC-7280315, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Pine Lawn City of. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Exhibit I - State Court File, #4 Exhibit II - Blakeney Consent to Removal, #5 Exhibit III - Mario Samad, Sam Samad and Pine Lawn Market Consent to Removal)(Hill, Blake) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.