Taylor v. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Plaintiff: Alvin Taylor
Defendant: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Case Number: 4:2019cv01714
Filed: June 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Ronnie L White
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 19, 2019 Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Ronnie L. White. (MFG)
June 18, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis with receipt number AMOEDC-7283391, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Alvin Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Charge of Discrimination, #2 EEOC Right to Sue Charging Letter EEOC Right to Sue Letter)(Nolan, Daniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor v. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alvin Taylor
Represented By: Daniel J. Nolan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?