Peterson v. Peterson
| Tyler Jeremy Peterson |
| Ashlee Peterson |
| 4:2019cv01759 |
| June 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Shirley Padmore Mensah |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MOTION for Extension of: TIME FOR JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN AND RULE 16 CONFERENCE by Plaintiff Tyler Jeremy Peterson. (Kazanas, Dan) |
| Filing 15 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Case Under Rule 12(b)(6) and Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Plaintiff Tyler Jeremy Peterson. (Kazanas, Dan) |
| Notice from Clerk instructing Plaintiff Tyler Jeremy Peterson to submit Notice regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 8/16/2019. (NEP) |
Filing 14
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #13 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #5 MOTION to Dismiss Case Under Rule 12(b)(6) by Plaintiff Tyler Jeremy Peterson. (Kazanas, Dan) filed by Tyler Jeremy Peterson; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shirley Padmore Mensah on 8/1/19. (KEK)
|
| Filing 13 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #5 MOTION to Dismiss Case Under Rule 12(b)(6) by Plaintiff Tyler Jeremy Peterson. (Kazanas, Dan) |
|
Filing 12
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #5 MOTION to Dismiss Case Under Rule 12(b)(6) by Plaintiff Tyler Jeremy Peterson. (Kazanas, Dan) filed by Tyler Jeremy Peterson ; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shirley Padmore Mensah on 7/11/19. (ARL)
|
| Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #5 MOTION to Dismiss Case Under Rule 12(b)(6) by Plaintiff Tyler Jeremy Peterson. (Kazanas, Dan) |
|
Filing 10
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss Case Under Rule 12(b)(6) by Defendant Ashlee Peterson. (Ernst, Edwin) filed by Ashlee Peterson; ORDERED GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiff's response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss must be filed no later than 7/12/2019, and Defendant's reply, if any, must be filed no later than 7/26/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shirley Padmore Mensah on 6/25/19. (KEK)
|
|
Filing 9
RULE 16 ORDER This case is assigned to Track: 2. Joint Scheduling Plan due by 8/13/2019. Rule 16 Conference set for 8/20/2019 10:00 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Shirley Padmore Mensah. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 8/13/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shirley Padmore Mensah on 6/25/19. (ARL)
|
| Filing 8 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW) |
| Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss Case Under Rule 12(b)(6) by Defendant Ashlee Peterson. (Ernst, Edwin) |
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Case Under Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Defendant Ashlee Peterson. (Ernst, Edwin) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss Case Under Rule 12(b)(6) by Defendant Ashlee Peterson. (Ernst, Edwin) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Ashlee Peterson Sent To: State Court - Executed (Ernst, Edwin) |
| Filing 3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: St. Louis County Circuit Court, filed by Tyler Jeremy Peterson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Agreement as to Pension Benefits)(JWD) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Ashlee Peterson Sent To: Plaintiff (Ernst, Edwin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of St. Louis County, case number 19SL-CC01854, with receipt number AMOEDC-7291104, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Ashlee Peterson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court File, #2 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil)(Ernst, Edwin) |
| Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: Honorable Shirley P. Mensah. (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Peterson v. Peterson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tyler Jeremy Peterson | |
| Represented By: | Dan J. Kazanas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ashlee Peterson | |
| Represented By: | Edwin C. Ernst, IV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
