Hughes v. Spielberg et al
| William C. Hughes |
| Industrial Light and Magic, Via Com, Sony, Paramount Pictures, George Lucas, Steven Spielberg, Columbia Pictures, Dreamworks and Amblin Entertainment |
| 4:2019cv01780 |
| June 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Jean C Hamilton |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER of USCA as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by William C. Hughes USCA Appeal #: 19-2510 The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 08/16/2019, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice.(AAS)
|
| Filing 9 Initial Notification from USCA for #7 Notice of Appeal filed by William C. Hughes USCA Appeal Number: 19-2510(AAS) |
| Filing 8 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL AND NOA SUPPLEMENT by clerk to USCA regarding #5 Order of Dismissal (case - Stipulation of Dismissal), #4 Memorandum & Order,,. Notice of Appeal filed on 07/12/2019 by Plaintiff William C. Hughes. NOTIFICATION TO COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTY: FILE REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPT WITH DISTRICT COURT CLERKS OFFICE.(MFG) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #4 Memorandum & Order,, #5 Order of Dismissal (case - Stipulation of Dismissal), by Plaintiff William C. Hughes. (AAS) |
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff William C. Hughes. (KJS) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE - In accordance with the Memorandum and Order entered herewith, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith.. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 6/25/19. (KJS)
|
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel [Doc. #3] is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith.. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 6/25/19. (KJS)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 4-5. Tue Jun 25 12:30:36 CDT 2019 (Shirley, Kelley)
|
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Jean C. Hamilton. (MFG) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (MFG) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Mon Jun 24 11:01:20 CDT 2019 (admin,) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff William C. Hughes. (MFG) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff William C. Hughes. (MFG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants Jury Demand,, filed by William C. Hughes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form)(MFG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
