Lee v. Walgreens Company
| Terrence Lee |
| Walgreens Company |
| 4:2019cv01792 |
| June 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Charles A Shaw |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed Walgreens Company served on 7/12/2019, answer due 8/2/2019. (MRC) |
Filing 6
ORDER -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. [Doc. 3]. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 6/28/2019. (MRC)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to defendant Walgreens Company. The summons was hand delivered to US Marshal Service. (Attachments: #1 USM Form 285)(MRC) |
| ***REMARK - Copy of updated Docket Sheet mailed to:Terrence Lee;1433 Ballard Dr.; St. Louis, MO 63137 (MRC) |
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 6. copy mailed to parties not electronically notified - Plaintiff Terrence Lee Fri Jun 28 14:18:03 CDT 2019 (Crayton, Michele)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to issue process or cause process to issue on the complaint. Walgreens Company shall be served with process on its designated agent, CT Corporation System, 120 South Central Avenue, Clayton, Missouri, 63105. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 6/27/19. (JWD)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 4. Mailed to plaintiff Terrence Lee. Thu Jun 27 16:54:44 CDT 2019 (Dockery, Jason)
|
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (BAK) |
| Case Opening Notification: All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Charles A. Shaw. (BAK) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue Jun 25 11:02:09 CDT 2019 (admin,) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Terrence Lee. (BAK) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Terrence Lee. (BAK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Walgreens Company Jury Demand,, filed by Terrence Lee. (Attachments: #1 EEOC Right to Sue Charging Letter, #2 EEOC Letter, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Original Filing Form)(BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lee v. Walgreens Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Terrence Lee | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walgreens Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
