Goodwin v. United State of America
| Michael Goodwin |
| USA |
| United State of America |
| 4:2019cv01893 |
| July 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Henry Edward Autrey |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Jillian S. Anderson for Respondent United State of America. (Anderson, Jillian) |
Filing 2
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER This case is assigned to Track: 4 - Coram Nobis IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following provisions shall apply in this case, and will be modified only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances: This case has been assigned to Track 4 (Administrative). Respondent shall show cause, in writing and within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, why the relief requested in the instant motion should not be granted. (Show Cause Response due by 9/29/2019.) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 7/25/19. (KJS)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant USA with receipt number AMOEDC-7320649, in the amount of $400 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Michael Goodwin. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form)(Woods, David) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Henry E. Autrey. (MFG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
