Dinkins v. USA
| Robert O. Dinkins |
| USA |
| 4:2019cv01920 |
| July 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Charles A Shaw |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's motion to vacate, set aside or correct illegal sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 is DENIED AND DISMISSED as successive. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 2253.. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 7/26/2019. (MRC)
|
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot. [Doc. 2] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant's motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence is DENIED AND DISMISSED as successive. [Doc. 1] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED as moot. [Doc. 3] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant's motion for service of process is DENIED. [Doc. 4] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant's request for the Court to take notice of the recent Supreme Court decision of Rehaif v. United States, 139 S.Ct. 2191 (2019) is GRANTED. The Court addressed movant's arguments herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue.. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 7/26/2019. (MRC)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 6,7. Copy mailed to parties not electronically notified - Movant Robert O. Dinkins Fri Jul 26 11:18:23 CDT 2019 (Crayton, Michele)
|
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Thu Jul 11 14:01:26 CDT 2019 (admin,) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Charles A. Shaw. (JWD) |
| Filing 5 PRO SE MOTION to Include in 2255 Dinkins SCOTUS US v. Rehaif Decision by Petitioner Robert O. Dinkins. (JWD) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE MOTION for Service by Petitioner Robert O. Dinkins. (JWD) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Petitioner Robert O. Dinkins. (JWD) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Robert O. Dinkins. (JWD) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by Petitioner Robert O. Dinkins. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dinkins v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Thomas J. Mehan |
| Represented By: | Sayler A. Fleming |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Robert O. Dinkins | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
