Thompson v. SS Adminstrative Office
Plaintiff: Kelvin C. Thompson
Defendant: SS Adminstrative Office
Case Number: 4:2019cv01922
Filed: July 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Stephen N Limbaugh
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE: In accordance with the Memorandum and Order entered herewith, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 8/19/19. (CSG)
August 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Kelvin C. Thompson, #3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Kelvin C. Thompson. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 3) is DENIED as moot. A separate Order of Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 8/19/19. (CSG)
August 19, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 9,10. Mon Aug 19 12:12:51 CDT 2019 (Gould, Cathy)
August 7, 2019 Filing 8 Request By Non-Prisoner Self-Represented Party for Electronic Noticing by Plaintiff Kelvin C. Thompson. (MRS)
August 5, 2019 Filing 7 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Kelvin C. Thompson. (MRS)
July 18, 2019 Filing 6 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Kelvin C. Thompson. (NEP)
July 17, 2019 Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Kelvin C. Thompson. (KXS)
July 12, 2019 Filing 4 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Kelvin C. Thompson. (TMT)
July 11, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Kelvin C. Thompson. (JWD)
July 11, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Kelvin C. Thompson. (JWD)
July 11, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant SS Adminstrative Office, Jury Demand, filed by Kelvin C. Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form)(JWD)
July 11, 2019 ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD)
July 11, 2019 ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Thu Jul 11 16:01:09 CDT 2019 (admin,)
July 11, 2019 Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh Jr.. (JWD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thompson v. SS Adminstrative Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SS Adminstrative Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelvin C. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?