State of Missouri et al v. Morales et al
Plaintiff: Circuit Attorney Office City of St. Louis and State of Missouri
Defendant: Melvin Leroy Tyler, Timothy Garnett and Ricardo Morales
Case Number: 4:2019cv02135
Filed: July 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Henry Edward Autrey
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1455
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER of USCA as to #14 Notice of Appeal filed by Melvin Leroy Tyler USCA Appeal #: 19-2995. If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, CDs, videos, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days.(AAS)
September 16, 2019 Filing 19 Initial Notification from USCA for #14 Notice of Appeal filed by Melvin Leroy Tyler USCA Appeal Number: 19-2995(AAS)
September 13, 2019 Filing 18 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL AND NOA SUPPLEMENT by clerk to USCA regarding #8 Order of Dismissal (case - Stipulation of Dismissal), #7 Opinion Memorandum,,, Add and Terminate Parties,,. Notice of Appeal filed on 9/12/19 by Defendant Melvin Leroy Tyler. NOTIFICATION TO COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTY: FILE REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPT WITH DISTRICT COURT CLERKS OFFICE.(BAK)
September 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED defendant Ricardo Morales motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [Doc. #15 ] is GRANTED.. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 9/13/19. (KJS)
September 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #15 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Defendant Melvin Leroy Tyler. (KJS) filed by Melvin Leroy Tyler ; LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED.. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 9/13/19. (KJS)
September 13, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 16. Fri Sep 13 11:26:38 CDT 2019 (Shirley, Kelley)
September 13, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 17. Fri Sep 13 14:30:28 CDT 2019 (Shirley, Kelley)
September 12, 2019 Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Defendant Melvin Leroy Tyler. (KJS)
September 12, 2019 Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #8 Order of Dismissal (case - Stipulation of Dismissal) by Defendant Melvin Leroy Tyler. (KJS)
September 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of this action [Doc. #11 ] is DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not allow defendants to file any additional motions in this closed action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an appeal from the denial of this motion would not be taken in good faith.. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 09/11/2019. (AAS)
September 11, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 13. Wed Sep 11 14:34:55 CDT 2019 (Shepard, Alicia)
September 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #11 PRO SE MOTION for this Court to Strike that Portion of this Courts Orders by Defendant Melvin Leroy Tyler. (KJS) filed by Melvin Leroy Tyler ; HAVING FULLY REVIEWED THE MOTION FILED BY MOVANT, THE MOTION IS DENIED. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 9/10/19. (KJS)
September 10, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 12. Tue Sep 10 13:50:10 CDT 2019 (Shirley, Kelley)
September 3, 2019 Filing 11 PRO SE MOTION for this Court to Strike that Portion of this Courts Orders by Defendant Melvin Leroy Tyler. (KJS)
August 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants motion to stay case and recuse the undersigned [Doc. #9 ] is DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith.. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 08/21/2019. (AAS)
August 21, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 10. Wed Aug 21 16:19:19 CDT 2019 (Shepard, Alicia)
August 20, 2019 Filing 9 PRO SE MOTION to Stay CASE PENDING APPEAL ON CLAIMS THIS COURT IS BIASED, PREJUDICE~ HATEFUL AND DISRESPECTFUL TO THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE AND SHOULD SAVE REC0SED ITSELF by Defendant Melvin Leroy Tyler. (AAS)
August 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF DISMISSAL - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 8/13/19. (KJS)
August 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants motions to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. #2 and #3 ) are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Timothy Garnett shall be vacated from the Docket as he has not submitted a motion to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the filing fee in this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants action for removal is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate Order of Dismissal shall be entered herewith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. (Timothy Garnett terminated.) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 8/13/19. (KJS)
August 13, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 7,8. Tue Aug 13 15:43:04 CDT 2019 (Shirley, Kelley)
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEARBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Recuse Judge Autry [sic] in the Alternative Certify the Issue to the United States Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit, [Doc. No. #5 ], is denied. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will deny the request to certify the issue to the Circuit Court for the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals.. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 8/12/19. (KJS)
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 6. Mon Aug 12 16:55:21 CDT 2019 (Shirley, Kelley)
August 9, 2019 Filing 5 PRO SE MOTION TO RECUSE JUDGE AUTRY IN THE ALTERNATE CERTIFY THE ISSUE TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 8TH. CIRCUIT. by Defendants Ricardo Morales, Melvin Leroy Tyler. (JMP)
July 24, 2019 Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Henry E. Autrey. (JWD)
July 24, 2019 ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD)
July 24, 2019 ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Wed Jul 24 12:01:42 CDT 2019 (admin,)
July 22, 2019 Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Defendant Melvin Leroy Tyler. (JWD)
July 22, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Affidavit in Support - Habeas Cases by Defendant Ricardo Morales. (JWD)
July 22, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION to Waive Filing Fees by Defendants Timothy Garnett, Ricardo Morales, Melvin Leroy Tyler. (JWD)
July 22, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of the City of St. Louuis, Missouri, case number 1022CR-03880; 77-232; 0722-CR05194-01, Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Ricardo Morales, Melvin Leroy Tyler, Timothy Garnett. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits and State Court Documents, #2 Envelope)(JWD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: State of Missouri et al v. Morales et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Circuit Attorney Office City of St. Louis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: State of Missouri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Melvin Leroy Tyler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy Garnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ricardo Morales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?