Innovative Timing Systems LLC v. End Max Sports, Inc.
| Innovative Timing Systems LLC |
| End Max Sports, Inc. |
| 4:2019cv02246 |
| July 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Stephen N Limbaugh |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #8 Consent MOTION for Extension of: Deadline for Defendant's First Responsive Pleading by Plaintiff Innovative Timing Systems LLC. (McAndrews, Matthew) filed by Innovative Timing Systems LLC ; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 08/22/19. (CMH)
|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of: Deadline for Defendant's First Responsive Pleading by Plaintiff Innovative Timing Systems LLC. (McAndrews, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Innovative Timing Systems LLC. End Max Sports, Inc. served on 8/3/2019, answer due 8/26/2019. (McAndrews, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Matthew G. McAndrews for Plaintiff Innovative Timing Systems LLC. (McAndrews, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Kyle D. Wallenberg for Plaintiff Innovative Timing Systems LLC. (Wallenberg, Kyle) |
| Filing 4 REPORT to Commissioner of filing or determination of an action regarding patent. (BAK) |
| Case Opening Notification: 1 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to attorney Matthew G. McAndrews. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh Jr.. (BAK) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Innovative Timing Systems LLC. Parent companies: None., Subsidiaries: None., Publicly held company: None.,. (McAndrews, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE Intent to Use Process Server: by Plaintiff Innovative Timing Systems LLC re #1 Complaint, Exhibits, and Summons (McAndrews, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against defendant End Max Sports, Inc. with receipt number AMOEDC-7358879, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Innovative Timing Systems LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Original Filing Form, #7 Summons)(McAndrews, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Innovative Timing Systems LLC v. End Max Sports, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Innovative Timing Systems LLC | |
| Represented By: | Matthew G. McAndrews |
| Represented By: | Kyle D. Wallenberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: End Max Sports, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
