Williams v. The Boeing Company
David Williams |
The Boeing Company |
4:2019cv02275 |
July 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Stephen R Clark |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUPPLEMENTAL - MCHR, Charge of Discrimination by Plaintiff David Williams. re #4 Memorandum & Order, #1 Complaint by Plaintiff David Williams. (KKS) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff David Williams. (KKS) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to send plaintiff an application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must either pay the $400 filing fee or submit an application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court may dismiss this action without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 8/8/2019. (CLO) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall submit a copy of his charge of discrimination within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's failure to comply with this Court's Order may result in a dismissal of this action, without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 8/8/2019. (CLO) |
***REMARK - Memorandum and Order #4 and #5 and application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs mailed to plaintiff as of this date. (CLO) |
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue Jul 30 15:01:18 CDT 2019 (admin,) |
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (BAK) |
Case Opening Notification: All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Stephen R. Clark. (BAK) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff David Williams. (BAK) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff David Williams. (BAK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant The Boeing Company Jury Demand,, filed by David Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 EEOC Right to Sue Charging Letter, #4 MCHR Right to Sue Charging Letter)(BAK) . |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Williams v. The Boeing Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: David Williams | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Boeing Company | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.