Wilson v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company
| Danny Wilson |
| Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company |
| 4:2019cv02321 |
| August 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| David D Noce |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Alternative Dispute Resolution. This case is referred to: Mediation; Designation of Lead Counsel: William Alexander Lamb; ADR Completion Deadline due by 2/29/2020. ADR Compliance Report Deadline due by 3/14/2020. Designation of Neutral/Conference Report due by 12/30/2019.. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 9/25/19. (KKS)
|
|
Filing 14
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER This case is assigned to Track: 2; Motion to Join Parties due by 3/1/2020. Discovery Completion due by 6/15/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 6/29/2020. Dispositive Motion Hearing set for 8/4/2020 10:00 AM in Courtroom 17N before Magistrate Judge David D. Noce. Jury Trial set for 10/19/2020 09:00 AM in Courtroom 17N before Magistrate Judge David D. Noce. Pretrial Conference set for 10/13/2020 10:00 AM in Courtroom 17N before Magistrate Judge David D. Noce.. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 9/25/19. (KKS)
|
| Filing 13 ELECTRONIC MINUTE ENTRY (no pdf attached) for Rule 16 Conference held before Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 9/25/2019. Conference held in person. CMO to issue. (proceedings started: 9:33) (proceedings ended: 9:41)(FTR Gold Operator initials: K Stamm)(Appearance for Plaintiff: William A. Lamb)(Appearance for Defendant: Peter B. Hoffman) (KKS) |
| Filing 12 JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Plaintiff Danny Wilson. . (Lamb, William) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CONFERENCE: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a Scheduling Conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 is set for Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. in the courtroom of the undersigned. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS) Joint Scheduling Plan due by 9/20/2019. Rule 16 Conference set for 9/25/2019 09:30 AM in Courtroom 17N before Magistrate Judge David D. Noce. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 9/5/19. (JAB)
|
| Filing 10 FULL CONSENT has been received by Defendant Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company, Plaintiff Danny Wilson. (CLO) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company Sent To: State Court - Executed (Hoffman, Peter) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company.(Hoffman, Peter) |
| Filing 7 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW) |
| Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable David D. Noce. (MFG) |
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENTAL State Court Docket Sheet. (MFG) |
| Filing 5 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Louis City, filed by Danny Wilson.(MFG) (Main Document 5 replaced on 8/12/2019) (MFG). |
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Peter B. Hoffman for Defendant Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company. (Hoffman, Peter) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company. Parent companies: The Procter & Gamble Company, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: The Procter & Gamble Company,. (Hoffman, Peter) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Attachment Notice of Removal)(Hoffman, Peter) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, case number 1922-CC10776, with receipt number AMOEDC-7386266, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court File, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hoffman, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wilson v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Danny Wilson | |
| Represented By: | William Alexander Lamb |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company | |
| Represented By: | Peter B. Hoffman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
