Kimble v. Ramey
| Myron J. Kimble |
| Eileen Ramey |
| 4:2019cv02549 |
| September 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Rodney W Sippel |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 10/25/19. (KEK)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 7. Fri Oct 25 13:31:49 CDT 2019 (Kratzer, Katie)
|
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM AND SHOW CAUSE ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner shall show cause, in writing and no later than twenty-eight days from the date of this Order, why this action should not be dismissed as time-barred. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner fails to comply with this Order, this action will be dismissed. Show Cause Response due by 10/17/2019.Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 9/19/19. (ARL)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 6. Thu Sep 19 14:15:34 CDT 2019 (Luisetti, Andrea)
|
| Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Missouri Western; Case Number 4:19-cv-00697. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. Case transferred in electronically. |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Thu Sep 12 14:01:13 CDT 2019 (admin,) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Rodney W. Sippel. (JWD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) |
| Case electronically transferred to the Eastern District of Missouri. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 and subject to modification by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri; and (2) this petition for a writ of habeas corpus is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri for all further proceedings. Signed on September 5, 2019 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Myron J Kimble. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Myron J Kimble. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kimble v. Ramey | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Eileen Ramey | |
| Represented By: | Caroline M. Coulter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Myron J. Kimble | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
